Linked Life Data

8017600

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/8017600

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
6
pubmed:dateCreated
1994-7-25
pubmed:abstractText
This study compares retrospectively the postoperative analgesia provided via intravenous opioids with continuous regional techniques (interpleural and epidural infusions) administered as a clinical routine by an anaesthesia-based Acute Pain Service. In 2630 patients no severe complications resulting in morbidity or mortality occurred; the rate of potentially serious complications was in the 0.5% range and comparable between the techniques. A detailed analysis of a randomised subsample of 340 patients revealed better analgesia at rest and better compliance with physiotherapy under continuous regional analgesia. Techniques of continuous regional analgesia also resulted in fewer incidents of desaturation and fewer side effects. Patient satisfaction with these techniques was higher than with intravenous opioid administration. In conclusion, continuous regional analgesia in a routine clinical setting is comparable to intravenous opioid administration with regard to safety, but results in significantly better analgesia with fewer side effects.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jun
pubmed:issn
0003-2409
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
49
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
528-32
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1994
pubmed:articleTitle
Continuous regional analgesia in comparison with intravenous opioid administration for routine postoperative pain control.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't