|
rdf:type |
|
|
lifeskim:mentions |
|
|
pubmed:issue |
7
|
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1994-11-29
|
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The goals of public accountability and quality improvement are compatible in theory but not necessarily in practice. Both concepts emphasize the customer. However, those working toward these two goals design systems with quite different roles and relationships between the providers and consumers of health care. Superficial interactions obstruct meaningful dialogue about how to build a better system meeting both sets of goals.
|
|
pubmed:commentsCorrections |
|
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
|
pubmed:journal |
|
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
|
pubmed:month |
Jul
|
|
pubmed:issn |
1070-3241
|
|
pubmed:author |
|
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
|
pubmed:volume |
20
|
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
|
pubmed:pagination |
396-401
|
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-8-28
|
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:7951770-Health Care Reform,
pubmed-meshheading:7951770-Hospitals,
pubmed-meshheading:7951770-Interprofessional Relations,
pubmed-meshheading:7951770-Models, Organizational,
pubmed-meshheading:7951770-New York,
pubmed-meshheading:7951770-Quality Assurance, Health Care,
pubmed-meshheading:7951770-Reimbursement, Incentive,
pubmed-meshheading:7951770-Social Responsibility,
pubmed-meshheading:7951770-United States
|
|
pubmed:year |
1994
|
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Are hospital quality improvement and public accountability compatible?
|
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Strong Memorial Hospital/University of Rochester Medical Center, New York 14642.
|
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|
