Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
11
pubmed:dateCreated
1994-11-18
pubmed:abstractText
This paper assessed the efficacy of arterio-venous fistulae, vein grafts, and synthetic grafts for long-term haemodialysis. Over a selected 10 year period, 486 primary access sites were established and 182 revisions were necessary. Access procedures were assessed for primary survival, the success or otherwise of revision surgery, and long-term efficacy for haemodialysis. Significant differences were shown for long-term survival of fistulae over vein grafts and synthetic grafts. Successful revision surgery favoured fistulae over synthetic grafts. Arterio-venous fistulae offered the best prospect for effective long-term dialysis. Revision surgery with continued dialysis using the primary-access site was largely unsuccessful, secondary access reconstruction being required in 78.2% of all failures.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Nov
pubmed:issn
0004-8682
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
64
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
763-7
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1994
pubmed:articleTitle
Primary access surgery for long-term haemodialysis.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Vascular and Transplantation Surgery, Prince Henry Hospital, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study