Linked Life Data

7878580

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/7878580

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3
pubmed:dateCreated
1995-4-6
pubmed:abstractText
The authors describe some situations where meta-analyses would have been of great benefit if they have been done or sufficiently published. They emphasize several problems ensued by this new method: if possible, meta-analyses have to be done each time a new trial is analysed, according to a precise method. Cumulative meta-analysis should rely on a regular and prospective registration of clinical trials. In all cases, meta-analyses should be available to a large number of physicians, in the main interest of patients.
pubmed:language
fre
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0040-5957
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
49
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
175-9
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:articleTitle
[Value and limits of conventional or cumulative meta analysis in obstetrics and gynecology].
pubmed:affiliation
CHRU de Lille.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, English Abstract, Randomized Controlled Trial, Meta-Analysis