Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
2
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1995-2-1
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Indications for carotid endarterectomy have engendered considerable debate among experts and have resulted in publication of retrospective reviews, natural history studies, audits of community practice, position papers, expert opinion statements, and finally prospective randomized trials. The American Heart Association assembled a group of experts in a multidisciplinary consensus conference to develop this statement.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
AIM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Jan
|
pubmed:issn |
0009-7322
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:day |
15
|
pubmed:volume |
91
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
N
|
pubmed:pagination |
566-79
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2007-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:7805271-Arterial Occlusive Diseases,
pubmed-meshheading:7805271-Carotid Artery Diseases,
pubmed-meshheading:7805271-Cerebrovascular Disorders,
pubmed-meshheading:7805271-Coronary Disease,
pubmed-meshheading:7805271-Cost-Benefit Analysis,
pubmed-meshheading:7805271-Endarterectomy, Carotid,
pubmed-meshheading:7805271-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:7805271-Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic,
pubmed-meshheading:7805271-Risk Factors
|
pubmed:year |
1995
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy. A multidisciplinary consensus statement from the Ad Hoc Committee, American Heart Association.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Office of Scientific Affairs, American Heart Association, Dallas, TX 75231-4596.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Guideline,
Review,
Practice Guideline
|