Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3
pubmed:dateCreated
1995-5-19
pubmed:databankReference
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/D00513, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/L10631, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/M16626, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/M18966, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/M20664, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/M23172, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/M26107, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/M33783, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/M58415, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/M96798, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/U03029, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/X03495, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/X03931, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/X04187, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/X05173, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/X17523, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/X52759, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/X52760, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/X52842, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/X53263, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/X59834, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/X60161, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/X65931, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/X67296, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/X69822, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/X70924, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/Z29560, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/Z29636
pubmed:abstractText
Recent studies in molecular evolution have generated strong conflicts in opinion as to how world living organisms should be classified. The traditional classification of life into five kingdom has been challenged by the molecular analysis carried out mostly on rRNA sequences, which supported the division of the extant living organisms into three major groups: Archaebacteria, Eubacteria, and Eukaryota. As to the problem of placing the root of the tree of life, the analysis carried out on a few genes has provided discrepant results. In order to measure the genetic distances between species, we have carried out an evolutionary analysis of the glutamine synthetase genes, which previously have been revealed to be good molecular clocks, and of the small and large rRNA genes. All data demonstrate that archaebacteria are more closely related to eubacteria than to eukaryota, thus supporting the classical division of living organisms into two main superkingdoms, Prokaryota and Eukaryota.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Mar
pubmed:issn
0022-2844
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
40
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
273-9
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1995
pubmed:articleTitle
Molecular classification of living organisms.
pubmed:affiliation
Dipartimento di Biochimica e Biologia Molecolare, Universitá di Bari, Italy.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't