Linked Life Data

7610731

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/7610731

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
5
pubmed:dateCreated
1995-8-17
pubmed:abstractText
In conventional surgery running suture of all intestine layers is used commonly. Therefore we have tested the following manual running suture technics for laparoscopic surgery using animal experiments. 1. Turnover technic: suture of front and back-wall from outside by using holding sutures. 2. Non-turnover-technic: special holding sutures to fix the back-wall and sewing from the inside followed by the front-wall from outside. 3. Clamp-technic: By using two special parallel closing clamps (Endo-Gauge) with a suture from inside and outside. The ends of the anastomosis are well fixed without additional suture. All animals (n = 15) survived without complications, without leakage of the anastomosis and only one third developed intraabdominal fusions. The main difference was in time performing the anastomosis: 64 min. for the turnover technic, 52 min. for the non-turnover technic and only 25 min for the clamp technic without holding sutures. According to this results, we start to design a new bowel-clamp for sewing laparoscopic anastomosis. Therefore it is possible to perform a laparoscopic manual running suture in a reasonable amount of time. Furthermore the laparoscopic manual suture is a good alternative to the stapler technic because it is much less expensive and leaves no foreign materials.
pubmed:language
ger
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0044-409X
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
120
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
409-14
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1995
pubmed:articleTitle
[Technique and quality of laparoscopic hand-sewn intestinal anastomoses in an experimental procedure].
pubmed:affiliation
Abteilung für Allgemeine Chirurgie, Abdominal- und Gefässchirurgie, Universität des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, English Abstract