Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
5
pubmed:dateCreated
1996-1-17
pubmed:abstractText
In the workup of unexplained nephrotic syndrome in the elderly patient, renal biopsy has shown amyloidosis to be the cause in 15-30% of the cases. Most of the cases of amyloidosis are primary and are, therefore, treatable with alkylating agents, albeit at a high level of toxicity. Abdominal fad pad biopsy has been suggested as a minimally invasive, low-cost method for diagnosing amyloidosis that is 100% specific. We report our experience with 3 consecutive cases of fat pad biopsy in the workup of unexplained nephrosis in the elderly patient: including the first false positive reported with respect to nephrotic renal disease, a false negative, and a true positive. We feel that in an elderly patient with unexplained nephrosis though the abdominal fat pad biopsy may be helpful, the patient should not be committed to a regimen with potentially very high toxicity on the basis of a positive fat pad biopsy alone. We recommend that the more invasive renal biopsy be performed should therapy with alkylating agents be contemplated.
pubmed:grant
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0250-8095
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
15
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
431-5
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-14
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1995
pubmed:articleTitle
Unreliability of the abdominal fat pad biopsy in the evaluation of nephrosis: report of 3 consecutive cases.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco 94143, USA.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S., Case Reports