Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
10
pubmed:dateCreated
1982-12-3
pubmed:abstractText
We reviewed the accuracy of contrast arteriography and ultrasound imaging procedures compared with autopsy findings. We propose that measurement of change in atherosclerotic lesions may substitute for mortality and morbidity of ischemic heart disease in clinical trials. Requirements of accuracy and precision for this application are more demanding than current clinical needs and are set by expected change rates of atherosclerotic lesions. Twelve studies that compared selective coronary arteriography with autopsy showed that arteriography generally underestimated the severity of atherosclerosis. Ultrasound B-mode, Doppler, and duplex images were compared with angiography in 21 studies, but have not been adequately calibrated at autopsy. We recommend that additional calibration of both imaging procedures against autopsy results be performed and be keyed to projected clinical applications.
pubmed:grant
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Oct
pubmed:issn
0003-9985
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
106
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
483-9
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1982
pubmed:articleTitle
The accuracy of arteriography and ultrasound imaging for atherosclerosis measurement. A review.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.