Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:dateCreated
1983-12-17
pubmed:abstractText
The aim of this study was to compare the healing capacities of sucralfate and cimetidine in gastric ulcer. Twenty-nine patients were randomly assigned to active sucralfate (1 g qid) and cimetidine placebo, or to cimetidine (300 mg qid) and sucralfate placebo. The patients were endoscoped before entry into the study, after 4 wk, and after 8 wk if complete healing was not found at 4 wk. Twenty-five patients completed the study. After 4 wk, 50% (6/12) of the sucralfate patients had healed in comparison to 54% (7/13) of cimetidine patients. After 8 wk, the cumulative healing rates were 75% and 77%, respectively. The results indicate that sucralfate is as effective as cimetidine in the short-term treatment of gastric ulcer.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0085-5928
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
83
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
37-41
pubmed:dateRevised
2008-2-13
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1983
pubmed:articleTitle
Short-term treatment with sucralfate or cimetidine in gastric ulcer: preliminary results of a controlled randomized trial.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't