Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions |
umls-concept:C0004927,
umls-concept:C0007589,
umls-concept:C0016928,
umls-concept:C0031809,
umls-concept:C0079809,
umls-concept:C0439849,
umls-concept:C0599883,
umls-concept:C0871261,
umls-concept:C1257890,
umls-concept:C1511938,
umls-concept:C1513371,
umls-concept:C1555903,
umls-concept:C1704632,
umls-concept:C1706817,
umls-concept:C2911692
|
pubmed:issue |
1
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1978-4-26
|
pubmed:abstractText |
GAIT performances of undergraduates were rated by peers and professsional clinical psychologists from video tape. Two additional measures; Potential for Clinical Effectiveness, and Insight into the Client's Problem, were included with GAIT measures of Openness, Empathy, Acceptance, and Outgoing and were also rated. GAIT ratings of Empathy, Acceptance, Potential for Clinical Effectiveness were not well differentiated. The behavioral response modes of each participant in the Understander's role were analyzed and correlated with GAIT measures, Potential and Insight. Empathy was correlated with reflecting feelings and advice-giving questions and negatively correlated with dysfunctional questions and silence. Acceptance was correlated with nonverbal attending behavior and negatively correlated with dysfunctional questions. Outgoing was positively correlated with information-gathering questions and total questions. Insight was correlated with reflecting feelings and negatively correlated with silence. An Understander who was rated high on Potential for Clinical Effectiveness was active, made statements about or asked questions pertaining to the Discloser's feelings, asked advice giving questions, tended to have infrequent silences during the interaction, and did not ask digressive or dysfunctional questions. Finally, the importance of Outgoing suggests the salience of an activity dimension in judged Clinical Potential.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Feb
|
pubmed:issn |
0091-0562
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
6
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
47-62
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2004-11-17
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:629235-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:629235-Clinical Competence,
pubmed-meshheading:629235-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:629235-Group Structure,
pubmed-meshheading:629235-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:629235-Interpersonal Relations,
pubmed-meshheading:629235-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:629235-Professional-Patient Relations,
pubmed-meshheading:629235-Psychological Tests,
pubmed-meshheading:629235-Psychology, Clinical
|
pubmed:year |
1978
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
The group assessment of interpersonal traits (GAIT): differentiation of measures and their relationship to behavioral response modes.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|