Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:6200840rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6200840lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0325343lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6200840lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0011037lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6200840lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0678226lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6200840lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1880489lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6200840lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0810633lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6200840pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6200840pubmed:dateCreated1984-5-24lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6200840pubmed:abstractTextMultiprogrammable pacemakers have long been subject to inappropriate reprogramming and electromagnetic interference (EMI). A limited clinical experience with DDD pacing systems precludes the significance of such phenomena in these units. Since August 1981, in a series of 140 DDD systems, certain units demonstrated consistent and reproducible resetting to the back-up modes caused by electrocautery. One unit was permanently reset to the VOO mode. These observations suggest the need for renewed caution at the time of surgery; they also underscore the importance of a thorough understanding of any DDD system and careful follow-up so that such phenomena will not be misinterpreted as pacemaker failure, resulting in erroneous pacemaker removal.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6200840pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6200840pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6200840pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6200840pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6200840pubmed:monthMarlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6200840pubmed:issn0147-8389lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6200840pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SanduMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6200840pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WarrenJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6200840pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BelottP HPHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6200840pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6200840pubmed:volume7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6200840pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6200840pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6200840pubmed:pagination169-72lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6200840pubmed:dateRevised2008-11-21lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6200840pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6200840-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6200840pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6200840-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6200840pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6200840-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6200840pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6200840-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6200840pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6200840-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6200840pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6200840-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6200840pubmed:year1984lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6200840pubmed:articleTitleResetting of DDD pacemakers due to EMI.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6200840pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed