Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
2
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
1979-9-17
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
A breast phantom of novel design has been used to measure visibility of simulated calcific and soft-tissue fibrillar details in mammography, as well as to determine the roentgen exposure vs. depth. Exposure data were combined with a model of the breast as compressed during mammography to compute the mean exposure to the ductal parenchyma (MDE). Three different imaging systems were compared over a wide range of x-ray beam energies and breast characteristics. "Dosage" criteria other than the MDE are discussed.
|
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
AIM
|
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:month |
Aug
|
| pubmed:issn |
0033-8419
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:volume |
132
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
455-62
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
| pubmed:meshHeading | |
| pubmed:year |
1979
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
A study of mammographic exposure and detail visibility using three systems: Xerox 125, Min-R, and Xonics XERG.
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study
|