Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
5
pubmed:dateCreated
1985-12-31
pubmed:abstractText
The value of contrast sensitivity testing in glaucoma is still unsettled. To determine their value in screening for glaucoma 2 methods were applied to glaucoma patients (12 simplex, 9 pseudo-exfoliative). The techniques included an oscilloscope method generating centrally presented gratings and the Arden grating test. Results obtained were compared to those of age-matched normals (n = 11, one eye randomly selected). Unacceptable false negative rates were found for both methods, as well as a high false positive rate (2/11 normals) with the Arden grating test, confirming findings in earlier studies. No correlation could be demonstrated between contrast sensitivity deficits and visual field disturbance, glaucoma type or duration. It was concluded that central contrast sensitivity for static gratings is unable to reliably indicate the presence or absence of early glaucoma.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Oct
pubmed:issn
0001-639X
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
63
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
481-6
pubmed:dateRevised
2010-11-18
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1985
pubmed:articleTitle
Central contrast sensitivity tests in the detection of early glaucoma.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't