Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1 Pt 1
pubmed:dateCreated
1985-1-22
pubmed:abstractText
Esophageal and anorectal pressures were recorded in 26 patients (4 men and 22 women) with scleroderma. Eleven patients suffered from a localized form of the disease and 15 from progressive systemic sclerosis. The latter only had marked functional abnormalities in esophageal and anorectal motility. Mean resting pressure at the lower esophageal sphincter of patients with progressive system sclerosis and controls was, respectively, 6 +/- 2 and 25 +/- 1 mmHg (p less than 0.001); mean closing pressure was 5 +/- 5 and 48 +/- 3 mmHg (p less than 0.001); coordination of opening the lower esophageal sphincter with the oncoming contraction in the distal esophagus was 0% and 68% +/- 5% (p less than 0.001); and relaxation (fall of the lower esophageal sphincter pressure to resting levels in the stomach) was 18% +/- 12% and 98% +/- 1% (p less than 0.001). The rectoanal inhibitory reflex was of lesser amplitude than normal in 74% of patients with progressive system sclerosis and was absent in 13%. Quantitative analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in response to rectal distention with 20 or more ml of air (p less than 0.001). There was a correlation between the amplitude of the lower esophageal sphincter relaxation and the amplitude of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex in response to rectal distention with 30-50 ml of air (p less than 0.05 to p less than 0.025). Our data show that in systemic sclerosis, anorectal motility is as frequently abnormal as esophageal motility.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jan
pubmed:issn
0016-5085
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
88
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1-7
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1985
pubmed:articleTitle
Comparative esophageal and anorectal motility in scleroderma.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't