Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions |
umls-concept:C0001554,
umls-concept:C0028005,
umls-concept:C0030685,
umls-concept:C0085580,
umls-concept:C0205178,
umls-concept:C0205191,
umls-concept:C0220825,
umls-concept:C0391871,
umls-concept:C0439834,
umls-concept:C0439841,
umls-concept:C0680255,
umls-concept:C1280500,
umls-concept:C1283071,
umls-concept:C1547135,
umls-concept:C1547139,
umls-concept:C1561560,
umls-concept:C1561561,
umls-concept:C1963578,
umls-concept:C1979590
|
pubmed:issue |
5
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1988-3-3
|
pubmed:abstractText |
We conducted a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study in 40 hypertensive subjects to assess the antihypertensive effect of a new galenic form of nicardipine administered at a dosage of 50 mg twice daily for 3 weeks. Regardless of whether blood pressure was measured by standard mercury sphygmomanometer, non-ambulatory automatic oscillometry or a Remler ambulatory blood pressure recorder, it dropped by a significantly larger amount in the nicardipine group than in the placebo group. In the control group, a placebo effect was observed with the ambulatory diastolic blood pressure recording, whereas it was not observed with hospital blood pressure measurements, especially when using the serial measurements performed for 30 min by an automatic recorder. The fall in blood pressure measured with the Remler recorder was correlated with the fall measured 10-20 min during one acute intravenous nicardipine perfusion before the trial, although the correlation coefficients do not suggest clinically relevant predictability of nicardipine efficacy at the individual level. The present findings support the need for controlled double-blind trials with careful office blood pressure measurements.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:chemical | |
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Oct
|
pubmed:issn |
0263-6352
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
5
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
599-604
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:3429863-Administration, Sublingual,
pubmed-meshheading:3429863-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:3429863-Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:3429863-Blood Pressure,
pubmed-meshheading:3429863-Blood Pressure Determination,
pubmed-meshheading:3429863-Delayed-Action Preparations,
pubmed-meshheading:3429863-Double-Blind Method,
pubmed-meshheading:3429863-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:3429863-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:3429863-Hypertension,
pubmed-meshheading:3429863-Infusions, Intravenous,
pubmed-meshheading:3429863-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:3429863-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:3429863-Nicardipine,
pubmed-meshheading:3429863-Random Allocation
|
pubmed:year |
1987
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Evaluation of slow release nicardipine in essential hypertension by casual and ambulatory blood pressure measurements. Effects of acute versus chronic administration.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Service d'Hypertension Artérielle-Hôpital Broussais, Paris, France.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Clinical Trial,
Randomized Controlled Trial,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|