Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
6
pubmed:dateCreated
1988-9-12
pubmed:abstractText
Four frequently referenced radiological methods for assessment of osteoarthrosis in hip joints are compared with respect to their interobserver variation. One hundred hip joints were rated by four observers. Each observer applied all four methods to all the radiographs. The results were analysed by a new statistical method, which allowed detailed assessment of the nature and extent of interobserver variation. Significant differences in terms of intraobserver disagreement were found, and Heripret's method was the best in this respect. All four methods showed a significant degree of systematic disagreement among the observers. This suggests that the interobserver variation might be reduced by confronting the observers with the results of the statistical analysis of their judgements.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jun
pubmed:issn
0277-6715
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
7
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
639-47
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1988
pubmed:articleTitle
A new method of estimation of interobserver variation and its application to the radiological assessment of osteoarthrosis in hip joints.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kolding Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't