Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
1988-2-22
pubmed:abstractText
Allergic Chinese, Japanese, Filipinos, and Caucasian groups were compared and contrasted according to their skin test reactivity to pollens of grasses and trees. If a subject reacted to grasses, there was a significantly greater risk of reaction to trees (P less than .0005). The risk was profoundly greater in the three non-Caucasian groups (Filipino, Chinese, and Japanese) compared with the Caucasian group (P less than .0005). Reactivity to grass appeared to amplify the risk of reaction to trees. This effect was particularly striking in the non-Caucasian groups. In groups that did not react to grasses, there was no difference between races in reactivity to trees. The non-Caucasian races did not demonstrate significant differences in their reaction to grasses. All three non-Caucasian groups appear to be more sensitive than the matched Caucasians to cedar, cypress, and juniper.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jan
pubmed:issn
0003-4738
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
60
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
53-6
pubmed:dateRevised
2008-11-21
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1988
pubmed:articleTitle
Antigen recognition in Filipinos, Japanese, Chinese, and Caucasians.
pubmed:affiliation
Mount Zion Hospital, San Francisco, California.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study