Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
8
pubmed:dateCreated
1988-9-7
pubmed:abstractText
The validity and reliability issues involved in using alternative patient classification systems were reviewed. Disease Staging and Patient Management Categories (PMCs) were applied separately and in conjunction with DRGs to three populations of patients drawn from a nine-hospital community data base. Data were examined with analyses that were as consistent as possible with hospital-based reviews of resource utilization. Questions focused on content and context validity (partially assessable by homogeneity), general and statistical reliability (measured by variance reduction), gaming, and cost. Ordinal stratifications were inconsistently produced, and improvement to DRGs' homogeneity was generally negligible. When used alone, staging produced only half the variance reduction of DRGs. PMCs, when used alone, appeared to produce sizeable variance reductions that may have been due to the large number of one- and two-case categories produced. Staging had category overlap, was expensive, and was unidimensional and subject to manipulation. PMCs had potentially serious logic problems, and both were inadequately documented. Neither system was considered appropriate for all needs, but each might work adequately under well-defined and limited conditions.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Aug
pubmed:issn
0025-7079
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
26
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
800-13
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1988
pubmed:articleTitle
Validity and reliability issues in alternative patient classification systems.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Family Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, New York.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article