Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
5
pubmed:dateCreated
1987-6-5
pubmed:abstractText
The aim of the present double-blind crossover study was to compare the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of enalapril and atenolol in 48 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. After a 2-week wash-out period, treatment was started with either enalapril 20 mg or atenolol 50 mg daily. In patients with a diastolic blood pressure value of more than 90 mmHg after 2 weeks of therapy, doses were doubled. After 4 weeks of therapy, cases were classified as responders (diastolic blood pressure less than or equal to 95 mmHg) or non-responders (diastolic blood pressure greater than 95 mmHg) and after a 2-week wash-out phase switched over to the alternative drug for another 4-week therapy period. Both substances significantly lowered mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure to a comparable degree. After 2 weeks, 57% of patients under enalapril and 59% under atenolol shared a satisfactory response, which did not change at the higher dose levels. After 4 weeks of therapy the incidence of side effects was slightly, but insignificantly, higher on atenolol than on enalapril. Thus, our results show that both agents seem equally qualified as first-step drugs in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Dec
pubmed:issn
0952-1178
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
4
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
S406-9
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1986
pubmed:articleTitle
Enalapril as a first-step agent in essential hypertension: a comparative study with atenolol.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Controlled Clinical Trial