3022336

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/3022336

Download in:

Switch to

Custom View

Named Graph Language Inference

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
Predicate	Object
rdf:type	pubmed:Citation
lifeskim:mentions	umls-concept:C0026995, umls-concept:C0040405, umls-concept:C0205245, umls-concept:C0392360, umls-concept:C1707455
pubmed:issue	4
pubmed:dateCreated	1986-12-9
pubmed:abstractText	The integral dose and organ dose produced by spinal lumbosacral CT and lumbosacral functional myelography were compared, using a phantom. The value of these methods of investigation is discussed.
pubmed:language	ger
pubmed:journal	http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/journal/7507497
pubmed:citationSubset	IM
pubmed:status	MEDLINE
pubmed:month	Oct
pubmed:issn	1438-9029
pubmed:author	pubmed-author:GrobovschekMM, pubmed-author:HofmannWW, pubmed-author:RahimHH
pubmed:issnType	Print
pubmed:volume	145
pubmed:owner	NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete	Y
pubmed:pagination	392-6
pubmed:dateRevised	2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading	pubmed-meshheading:3022336-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:3022336-Lumbosacral Region, pubmed-meshheading:3022336-Models, Structural, pubmed-meshheading:3022336-Myelography, pubmed-meshheading:3022336-Radiation Dosage, pubmed-meshheading:3022336-Tomography, X-Ray Computed
pubmed:year	1986
pubmed:articleTitle	[Lumbosacral computed tomography and lumbosacral functional myelography. Dosimetric comparison and comparison of indications].
pubmed:publicationType	Journal Article, Comparative Study, English Abstract