Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
6
pubmed:dateCreated
1990-1-23
pubmed:abstractText
In order to determine which variables are useful in identifying horses with abdominal pain requiring surgery, data were analysed from 219 horses presented at one veterinary teaching hospital. Using multiple stepwise discriminant analysis with a recursive partitioning algorithm, we obtained a decision tree that identifies surgical and non-surgical patients. The prevalence of surgical patients was 79 per cent in this population. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of this decision tree were 99 per cent, 55 per cent, 90 per cent and 99 per cent respectively. Compared to the clinical decision, this decision tree yielded more false positives (11 per cent) but almost eliminated false negatives (1 per cent). This decision tree was validated by the jack-knife method and also by evaluation using a new sample in a second veterinary teaching hospital in which the prevalence of surgical patients was 55 per cent. This led to sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of 93 per cent, 73 per cent, 81 per cent and 89 per cent respectively.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Nov
pubmed:issn
0425-1644
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
21
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
447-50
pubmed:dateRevised
2003-11-14
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1989
pubmed:articleTitle
A computer-derived protocol to aid in selecting medical versus surgical treatment of horses with abdominal pain.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Clinical Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article