Linked Life Data

2672354

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/2672354

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
9
pubmed:dateCreated
1989-10-12
pubmed:abstractText
The preferred method for the treatment of penetrating injuries to the colon remains a source of controversy. In our retrospective review of 65 patients with penetrating colon injuries, 33 patients were managed by colostomy formation, 30 were treated by primary repair, and two had exteriorized repair with early return to the abdominal cavity (drop back). The anatomic location of injury was ascending colon in 19 (29%), transverse colon in 20 (31%), descending colon in 22 (34%), and multiple sites in four (6%). The average penetrating abdominal trauma index (PATI) was 24 (ascending colon injuries, 23; transverse colon, 26; descending colon, 24; and multiple colon sites, 28). Overall septic morbidity was 15/65 (23%). Colostomy closure was later done in 32/33 (97%), with a morbidity of 7/32 (22%). The mean length of hospital stay for primary repair was ten days and for colostomy (including both required hospital stays), 26 days (P less than .05). These data suggest that primary repair is as safe as colostomy formation for the management of penetrating colon injuries, regardless of anatomic site of injury.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Sep
pubmed:issn
0038-4348
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
82
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1099-102
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1989
pubmed:articleTitle
Penetrating injuries to the colon: analysis by anatomic region of injury.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Review