Linked Life Data

2614297

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/2614297

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:dateCreated
1990-3-15
pubmed:abstractText
The authors used two separate protocols to compare four commercially available devices for recording of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram and "late potentials" to assess their degree of concordance in identifying abnormalities. In one protocol, studies were performed using each system. In 19% of recordings the results from one system were discordant in at least one numeric parameter. In the second protocol identical averaged data files were used to identify discordancies due solely to differences in analysis algorithms used for QRS offset determination by the various devices. This disclosed 23% discordant findings, mostly in the root mean square amplitude of the terminal 40-msec segment resulting from small differences in the estimate of QRS offset point. To improve concordance between commercial systems, there is an urgent need for adoption of a rigorously standardized algorithm for analysis of baseline noise and QRS offset.
pubmed:grant
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0022-0736
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
22 Suppl
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
19-24
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-11-11
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1989
pubmed:articleTitle
The signal-averaged electrocardiogram and late potentials. A comparative analysis of commercial devices.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Medicine, State University of New York Health Science Center.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S., Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.