Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
4
pubmed:dateCreated
1989-5-25
pubmed:abstractText
42 CT and MR examinations of orofacial tumours have been analysed and their value has been compared. In 78% of cases MR was superior to CT in delineating the tumour borders. T1-weighted and gradient echo sequences after intravenous gadolinium injection were particularly useful. Nevertheless, T-staging based on clinical and CT findings was altered in only two cases (5%) by MR. MR should, at present, be used in those cases where small tumours can not be demonstrated by CT, or where metal artifacts obscure the region of interest.
pubmed:language
ger
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Apr
pubmed:issn
1438-9029
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
150
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
425-33
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1989
pubmed:articleTitle
[Magnetic resonance tomography of the oral cavity, the oropharynx and the mouth floor: comparison with computed tomography].
pubmed:affiliation
Radiologische Klinik der Universität Tübingen, Abt. für Radiologische Diagnostik.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, English Abstract