Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
11 Pt 2
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1989-2-23
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The aim of this study was to evaluate the importance of atrial synchronism for pacing therapy of patients with mixed carotid sinus syndrome. In 23 patients (21 m, two f; mean age 69 +/- 8 years) affected by symptomatic mixed carotid sinus syndrome we performed: (1) Research of ventriculo-atrial conduction, orthostatic hypotension and pacemaker effect; and (2) Carotid sinus massage in the standing position during VVI and DVI temporary pacing. Next, all patients received a permanent DDD pacemaker and entered a 2 month two period single-blind, randomized, cross-over study on DVI/DDD versus VVI mode. During the DVI/DDD period, no syncope occurred in any patients, minor symptoms persisted in 11 (48%) of them; during VVI period syncopes recurred in three patients, symptoms requiring the withdrawal of VVI pacing and premature DVI/DDD reprogramming in eight patients, minor symptoms in 17 (74%). A comparison between 14 patients, who preferred DVI/DDD period (Group A), and the remaining nine patients who noted no preference between DVI/DDD and VVI period (Group B) was performed on the basis of the preimplant evaluation. Group A patients had a greater pacemaker effect (-34 +/- 16 mmHg vs -16 +/- 14 mmHg) and a higher prevalence of symptomatic pacemaker effect (50% vs 0%), of ventriculo-atrial conduction (78% vs 44%) and of orthostatic hypotension (50% vs 11%), while the entity of the systolic pressure fall caused by carotid sinus massage was similar in the two groups either during VVI mode (Group A -51 +/- 16 mmHg vs Group B -56 +/- 27 mmHg) or DVI mode (Group A -38 +/- 17 mmHg vs Group B -45 +/- 17 mmHg).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Nov
|
pubmed:issn |
0147-8389
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
11
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
1902-10
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2007-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:2463565-Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:2463565-Cardiac Pacing, Artificial,
pubmed-meshheading:2463565-Carotid Sinus,
pubmed-meshheading:2463565-Clinical Trials as Topic,
pubmed-meshheading:2463565-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:2463565-Follow-Up Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:2463565-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:2463565-Hypotension, Orthostatic,
pubmed-meshheading:2463565-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:2463565-Pacemaker, Artificial,
pubmed-meshheading:2463565-Random Allocation,
pubmed-meshheading:2463565-Reflex, Abnormal,
pubmed-meshheading:2463565-Syncope,
pubmed-meshheading:2463565-Syndrome
|
pubmed:year |
1988
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Is DDD superior to VVI pacing in mixed carotid sinus syndrome? An acute and medium-term study.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Laboratory of Electrophysiology and Pacemaker Implant, Service of Cardiology, Hospital of Lavagna, Italy.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Clinical Trial,
Comparative Study,
Randomized Controlled Trial
|