Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:2253997rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2253997lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0007876lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2253997lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0021289lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2253997lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1274040lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2253997lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205421lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2253997pubmed:issue6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2253997pubmed:dateCreated1991-1-24lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2253997pubmed:abstractTextOne hundred and twenty one consecutive cesarean sections producing single term, appropriate for gestational age neonates, out of which 85% were emergency cesareans, were included in this study. Fetal distress, nonprogress of labour, and cephalopelvic disproportion were major indications for surgery. The waiting period varied from less than 30 minutes to greater than 4 hours. More than 50% of neonates studied suffered from some problem. The morbidity increased significantly if cesarean section was delayed for more than two hours.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2253997pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2253997pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2253997pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2253997pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2253997pubmed:monthJunlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2253997pubmed:issn0019-6061lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2253997pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KumariSSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2253997pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DuttaA KAKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2253997pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HaldarDDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2253997pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SailiAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2253997pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SarnaM SMSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2253997pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2253997pubmed:volume27lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2253997pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2253997pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2253997pubmed:pagination601-4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2253997pubmed:dateRevised2005-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2253997pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2253997-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2253997pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2253997-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2253997pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2253997-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2253997pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2253997-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2253997pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2253997-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2253997pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2253997-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2253997pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2253997-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2253997pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2253997-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2253997pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2253997-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2253997pubmed:year1990lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2253997pubmed:articleTitleDelayed cesarean section: neonatal outcome.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2253997pubmed:affiliationNeonatal Unit, Kalawati Saran Children's Hospital, New Delhi.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2253997pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed