Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
9
pubmed:dateCreated
2011-9-28
pubmed:abstractText
Computed tomography of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis (CTCAP) has become the mainstay of diagnosis in stable blunt trauma patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether standard CTCAP has adequate sensitivity to identify fractures of the scapula, clavicle, and humeral head to replace routine radiographs of the shoulder. A retrospective chart review was carried out from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2007, at Morristown Memorial Hospital. Inclusion criteria were all shoulder fracture patients in our trauma registry who underwent both a CTCAP and plain radiographs of the injured shoulder. Data were collected for patient age, sex, Injury Severity Score, mechanism of injury, and fracture location. Sensitivity was calculated for each diagnostic modality as well as hospital costs and radiation dose of plain radiographs. A total of 374 charts were reviewed and 98 patients were included in the study with a total of 117 fractures. The sensitivity of trauma CTCAP for scapula fractures was 100 per cent, clavicle fractures 98 per cent, and humeral head fractures 100 per cent. The sensitivity of the shoulder series for scapula fractures was 60 per cent, clavicle fractures 85 per cent, and humeral head fractures 100 per cent. The plain radiographs added $298 in hospital charges and 0.191 mSv of radiation per patient. CTCAP is a sensitive tool for identifying fractures in the shoulder girdle. Therefore, CTCAP can replace the routine radiographs of the shoulder resulting in less total radiation exposure of the trauma patients. This also would lead to lower healthcare cost and better diagnostic workflow.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Sep
pubmed:issn
1555-9823
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Electronic
pubmed:volume
77
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1183-7
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed-meshheading:21944628-Cost-Benefit Analysis, pubmed-meshheading:21944628-Diagnosis, Differential, pubmed-meshheading:21944628-Female, pubmed-meshheading:21944628-Follow-Up Studies, pubmed-meshheading:21944628-Hospital Charges, pubmed-meshheading:21944628-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:21944628-Male, pubmed-meshheading:21944628-Middle Aged, pubmed-meshheading:21944628-New Jersey, pubmed-meshheading:21944628-Pelvis, pubmed-meshheading:21944628-Radiography, Abdominal, pubmed-meshheading:21944628-Radiography, Thoracic, pubmed-meshheading:21944628-Retrospective Studies, pubmed-meshheading:21944628-Sensitivity and Specificity, pubmed-meshheading:21944628-Shoulder Fractures, pubmed-meshheading:21944628-Tomography, X-Ray Computed, pubmed-meshheading:21944628-Trauma Severity Indices, pubmed-meshheading:21944628-Wounds, Nonpenetrating
pubmed:year
2011
pubmed:articleTitle
Standard computed tomography of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis is sensitive and cost-effective for the detection of fractures of the shoulder girdle.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Surgery, Morristown Medical Center, Morristown, New Jersey, USA.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study