Linked Life Data

21169651

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/21169651

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
5
pubmed:dateCreated
2011-6-9
pubmed:abstractText
Appraisal of the methodological quality of systematic reviews would reflect on their utility for the clinicians and policymakers. This study was done to assess the quality of systematic reviews published in five leading Indian medical journals using AMSTAR. 22 systematic reviews of healthcare interventions were identified. The scores ranged 0 to 10 (mean 3.77 and median 2.5), 9 reviews scored > 4/11. Most frequent yes and no scores were: publication status as an inclusion criterion (12 /22), respectively and duplicate study selection and data extraction (17 /22). Several suboptimal aspects of methodological quality were identified in the reviews evaluated.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
May
pubmed:issn
0974-7559
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Electronic
pubmed:day
7
pubmed:volume
48
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
383-5
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2011
pubmed:articleTitle
Quality assessment of systematic reviews of health care interventions using AMSTAR.
pubmed:affiliation
UKCC (Bahrain Branch) and Ministry of Health, Bahrain, Box 25438, Bahrain. kidzdoc311@gmail.com
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article