rdf:type |
|
lifeskim:mentions |
|
pubmed:issue |
1
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2011-1-3
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates with vancomycin MICs of 2 ?g/ml have been associated with vancomycin therapeutic failure and the heteroresistant vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (hVISA) phenotype. A population analysis profile (PAP) with an area under the curve (AUC) ratio of ? 0.9 for the AUC of the clinical isolate versus the AUC for hVISA strain Mu3 is most often used for determining hVISA, but it is time-consuming and labor-intensive. A collection of 140 MRSA blood isolates with vancomycin MICs of 2 ?g/ml by reference broth microdilution and screened for hVISA using PAP-AUC (21/140 [15%] hVISA) were tested by additional methods to detect hVISA. The methods included (i) Etest macromethod using vancomycin and teicoplanin test strips, brain heart infusion (BHI) agar, and a 2.0 McFarland inoculum; (ii) Etest glycopeptide resistance detection (GRD) using vancomycin-teicoplanin double-sided gradient test strips on Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA) with 5% sheep blood and a 0.5 McFarland inoculum; and (iii) BHI screen agar plates containing 4 ?g/ml vancomycin and 16 g/liter casein using 0.5 and 2.0 McFarland inocula. Each method was evaluated using PAP-AUC as the reference method. The sensitivity of each method for detecting hVISA was higher when the results were read at 48 h. The Etest macromethod was 57% sensitive and 96% specific, Etest GRD was 57% sensitive and 97% specific, and BHI screen agar was 90% sensitive and 95% specific with a 0.5 McFarland inoculum and 100% sensitive and 68% specific with a 2.0 McFarland inoculum. BHI screen agar with 4 ?g/ml vancomycin and casein and a 0.5 McFarland inoculum had the best sensitivity and specificity combination, was easy to perform, and may be useful for clinical detection of hVISA.
|
pubmed:commentsCorrections |
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21048008-10334262,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21048008-11222571,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21048008-11266410,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21048008-11427551,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21048008-11758077,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21048008-11759091,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21048008-11871491,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21048008-12654656,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21048008-14506006,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21048008-14605151,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21048008-14727222,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21048008-15184410,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21048008-15200819,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21048008-16286482,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21048008-16323115,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21048008-16323119,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21048008-16940100,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21048008-16957043,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21048008-16982298,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21048008-17108069,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21048008-17344363,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21048008-17407040,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21048008-17623693,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21048008-17892555,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21048008-18596146,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21048008-18632899,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21048008-18838583,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21048008-19199552,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21048008-19553587,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21048008-19744978,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21048008-19949062,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21048008-2141343,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21048008-8285629,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21048008-9400512,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21048008-9593175,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21048008-9684652
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal |
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:chemical |
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Jan
|
pubmed:issn |
1098-660X
|
pubmed:author |
|
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:volume |
49
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
177-83
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2011-8-1
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
|
pubmed:year |
2011
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Comparison of detection methods for heteroresistant vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus, with the population analysis profile method as the reference method.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. ssatola@emory.edu
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.,
Evaluation Studies
|