Linked Life Data

20869710

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/20869710

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
6
pubmed:dateCreated
2010-11-29
pubmed:databankReference
pubmed:abstractText
Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) has a lower risk of hemorrhage than sphincterotomy and is easier to perform in altered/difficult anatomy. However, the sphincter of Oddi (SO) is only stretched but not cut after EPBD. Therefore, the biliary orifice is less opened, and failed stone extraction with EPBD alone occurs in up to 20% of patients. An uncut SO also may exacerbate pancreatic duct compression from edema after EPBD, and it increases the risk of pancreatitis.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Dec
pubmed:issn
1097-6779
pubmed:author
pubmed:copyrightInfo
Copyright © 2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
pubmed:issnType
Electronic
pubmed:volume
72
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1154-62
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2010
pubmed:articleTitle
Randomized trial of 1-minute versus 5-minute endoscopic balloon dilation for extraction of bile duct stones.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National TaiwanUniversity College of Medicine, Taipei.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Multicenter Study