Linked Life Data

20860675

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/20860675

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3
pubmed:dateCreated
2011-3-10
pubmed:abstractText
Skin commensal bacteria account for most septic reactions after apheresis platelet (PLT) transfusion. Consequently, we evaluated the effectiveness of two skin disinfection methods in preventing bacterial contamination of PLT collections.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Mar
pubmed:issn
1537-2995
pubmed:author
pubmed:copyrightInfo
© 2010 American Association of Blood Banks.
pubmed:issnType
Electronic
pubmed:volume
51
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
531-8
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2011
pubmed:articleTitle
Skin disinfection with a single-step 2% chlorhexidine swab is more effective than a two-step povidone-iodine method in preventing bacterial contamination of apheresis platelets.
pubmed:affiliation
Biomedical Services, Medical Office, Jerome H Holland Laboratory, Rockville, Maryland, USA. BenjaminR@usa.redcross.org
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article