Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
1991-6-18
pubmed:abstractText
Large randomized trials have shown that surgical revascularization is more effective than medical therapy in relieving angina and improving exercise tolerance. Development of atherosclerosis in the vein grafts plus progression of disease in the native vessels, however, results in a return of angina in a substantial proportion of patients 5 to 10 years after the procedure. The better myocardial protection, more complete revascularization, and improved graft patency rates that have occurred in the last decade imply that survival following coronary artery bypass may be improved in a broader spectrum of coronary artery disease patients than documented in the randomized trials. Patients with unstable angina have higher operative mortality but clearly benefit symptomatically from revascularization. There is a need for randomized trials to compare the relative risks and benefits of angioplasty versus surgical revascularization.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Feb
pubmed:issn
0733-8651
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
9
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
135-55
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1991
pubmed:articleTitle
Coronary bypass surgery for stable angina and unstable angina pectoris.
pubmed:affiliation
University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S., Review