Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/20220522
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
3
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2010-4-14
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Accuracy of incidence estimates may be affected by biases that depend on frequency of approach to reporters and reporting window length. A time-sampling strategy enables infrequent approaches with short windows but has never been evaluated.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
May
|
pubmed:issn |
1531-5487
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:volume |
21
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
376-8
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2010-9-9
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:20220522-Cohort Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:20220522-Cross-Over Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:20220522-Epidemiologic Research Design,
pubmed-meshheading:20220522-Great Britain,
pubmed-meshheading:20220522-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:20220522-Occupational Diseases,
pubmed-meshheading:20220522-Sampling Studies
|
pubmed:year |
2010
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Time-sampled versus continuous-time reporting for measuring incidence.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Health Methodology Research Group, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom. rmcnamee@manchester.ac.uk
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Randomized Controlled Trial,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|