Linked Life Data

2018693

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/2018693

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
5
pubmed:dateCreated
1991-5-30
pubmed:abstractText
A clinical trial comparing the efficacy of a glass polyalkenoate cement (GPC) restoration with an amalgam cement restoration (ACR) in the management of caries in the deciduous molar dentition was undertaken. Two hundred and thirty-eight restorations, that is 119 pairs, were placed in 76 patients with an age range of 5 to 11 years. The durability of these restorations was assessed during a 5-year follow-up period, using modified United States Public Health Service criteria. The glass polyalkenoate cement restorations occupied 16% of the occlusal surface of the tooth compared to 28% for the amalgam restorations, had a lower median survival time (33.4 [SE 2.26] months compared to 41.4 [SE 2.24] months) and underwent greater loss of anatomical form and marginal integrity than the paired amalgam controls.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
D
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Mar
pubmed:issn
0007-0610
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:day
9
pubmed:volume
170
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
177-81
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1991
pubmed:articleTitle
The 5-year results of a clinical trial comparing a glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement restoration with an amalgam restoration.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Child Dental Health, Dental School, Newcastle upon Tyne.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't