Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
4
pubmed:dateCreated
2010-3-22
pubmed:abstractText
The benefit of stentless valves remains in question. In 1999, a randomized trial comparing stentless and stented valves was unable to demonstrate any hemodynamic or clinical benefits at 1 year after implantation. This study reviews long-term outcomes of patients randomized in the aforementioned trial.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Apr
pubmed:issn
1097-685X
pubmed:author
pubmed:copyrightInfo
Copyright 2010 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
pubmed:issnType
Electronic
pubmed:volume
139
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
848-59
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2010
pubmed:articleTitle
Are stentless valves hemodynamically superior to stented valves? Long-term follow-up of a randomized trial comparing Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve with the Toronto Stentless Porcine Valve.
pubmed:affiliation
Division of Cardiovascular Surgery at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and the University of Toronto, H-429, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, Ontario M4 N 3M5, Canada. gideon.cohen@sunnybrook.ca
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't