Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/20054593
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
2
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2011-3-14
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The aim of this randomized double-blind, clinical trial was to compare the use of enamel matrix derivative (EMD) and demineralised freeze-dried bone allografts (DFDBA) with DFDBA alone for the treatment of human periodontal intrabony defects at 12 months post-surgery. Fifty-six intrabony osseous defects in 56 periodontis patients were randomly assigned to the test group (DFDBA + EMD) or the control group (DFDBA) for periodontal treatment. Clinical and radiographic measurements were made at the baseline and after 12 months. Compared to baseline, the 12-month results indicated that both treatment modalities resulted in significant changes in all clinical parameters (gingival index, bleeding on probing, probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival recession; P < 0.05) and radiographic parameters (hard tissue fill (HTF) and bone depth reduction; P <0.05). Furthermore, statistically significant differences were found in the test group compared to the control group in PD reduction (5.0 mm vs. 4.0 mm; P < 0.05), CAL gain (4.0 mm vs. 3.25 mm), and HTF (4.0 mm vs. 3.5 mm; P?<?0.05). In the test group, 25% of sites gained > 4 mm of CAL, while in the control group, 7.1% of sites gained > 4 mm of CAL. Both treatments showed a good soft and hard periodontal tissue response. At 12 months post-surgery, the combined use of DFDBA and EMD seemed to produce a statistically significant improvement of PD reduction, CAL gain, and HTF.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
D
|
pubmed:chemical | |
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Apr
|
pubmed:issn |
1436-3771
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:volume |
15
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
225-32
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:20054593-Alveolar Bone Loss,
pubmed-meshheading:20054593-Bone Regeneration,
pubmed-meshheading:20054593-Bone Transplantation,
pubmed-meshheading:20054593-Decalcification Technique,
pubmed-meshheading:20054593-Dental Enamel Proteins,
pubmed-meshheading:20054593-Double-Blind Method,
pubmed-meshheading:20054593-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:20054593-Freeze Drying,
pubmed-meshheading:20054593-Gingival Recession,
pubmed-meshheading:20054593-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:20054593-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:20054593-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:20054593-Oral Surgical Procedures,
pubmed-meshheading:20054593-Periodontal Attachment Loss,
pubmed-meshheading:20054593-Periodontal Index,
pubmed-meshheading:20054593-Statistics, Nonparametric,
pubmed-meshheading:20054593-Treatment Outcome
|
pubmed:year |
2011
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Comparative study of DFDBA in combination with enamel matrix derivative versus DFDBA alone for treatment of periodontal intrabony defects at 12 months post-surgery.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Periodontology-Department of Clinical and Dental Sciences, Polytechnic University of the Marche, Via Tronto 10/a, Torrette di Ancona, Italy.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Randomized Controlled Trial
|