Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/20003949
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
1
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2009-12-16
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The aim of this study was to evaluate apical transportation and working length changes after instrumentation using EndoSequence (Brasseler USA, Savannah, GA) and Guidance V-taper (Guidance Endo, Albuquerque, NM) rotary files.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
D
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Jan
|
pubmed:issn |
1878-3554
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:volume |
36
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
123-5
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:20003949-Dental Instruments,
pubmed-meshheading:20003949-Dental Pulp Cavity,
pubmed-meshheading:20003949-Equipment Design,
pubmed-meshheading:20003949-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:20003949-Molar,
pubmed-meshheading:20003949-Odontometry,
pubmed-meshheading:20003949-Root Canal Preparation,
pubmed-meshheading:20003949-Tooth Apex
|
pubmed:year |
2010
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
A comparison of apical transportation and length control between EndoSequence and Guidance rotary instruments.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Endodontics, University of Pennsylvania, School of Dental Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. bekirk@mac.com
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study
|