Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/19967742
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
2
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2010-3-2
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The successful derivation of iPSC lines effectively demonstrates that it is possible to reset the 'developmental clock' of somatic cells all the way back to the initial embryonic state. Hence, it is plausible that this clock may instead be turned back half-way to a less immature developmental stage that is more directly applicable to clinical therapeutic applications or for in vitro pharmacology/toxicology screening assays. Such a suitable developmental state is postulated to be either the putative transit amplifying progenitor stage or adult stem cell stage. It is hypothetically possible to reprogram mature and terminally differentiated somatic cells back to the adult stem cell or transit amplifying progenitor stage, in a manner similar to the derivation of iPSC. It is proposed that the terminology 'Induced Adult Stem Cells' (iASC) or 'Induced Transit Amplifying Progenitor Cells' (iTAPC) be used to described such reprogrammed somatic cells. Of particular interest, is the possibility of resetting the developmental clock of mature differentiated somatic cells of the mesenchymal lineage, explanted from adipose tissue, bone marrow and cartilage. The putative adult stem cell sub-population from which these cells are derived, commonly referred to as 'mesenchymal stem cells', are highly versatile and hold much therapeutic promise in regenerative medicine, as attested to by numerous human clinical trials and animal studies. Perhaps it may be appropriate to term such reprogrammed cells as 'Induced Mesenchymal Stem Cells' (iMSC) or as 'Induced Mesenchumal Progenitor Cells' (iMPC). Given that cells from the same organ/tissue will share some commonalities in gene expression, we hypothesize that the generation of iASC or iTAPC would be more efficient as compared to iPSC generation, since a common epigenetic program must exist between the reprogrammed cells, adult stem cell or progenitor cell types and terminally differentiated cell types from the same organ/tissue.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:chemical | |
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Feb
|
pubmed:issn |
1932-7005
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:volume |
4
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
159-62
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:19967742-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:19967742-Adult Stem Cells,
pubmed-meshheading:19967742-Cell Differentiation,
pubmed-meshheading:19967742-Epigenesis, Genetic,
pubmed-meshheading:19967742-Gene Transfer Techniques,
pubmed-meshheading:19967742-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:19967742-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells,
pubmed-meshheading:19967742-Stem Cell Transplantation,
pubmed-meshheading:19967742-Transcription Factors
|
pubmed:year |
2010
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Induced adult stem (iAS) cells and induced transit amplifying progenitor (iTAP) cells-a possible alternative to induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells?
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Abbott Vascular Inc., 3200 Lakeside Drive, Santa Clara, CA 95054, USA. boonchinheng@gmail.com
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|