Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
12
pubmed:dateCreated
2009-12-1
pubmed:abstractText
Over the past few years, a number of new nucleic acid extraction methods and extraction platforms using chemistry combined with magnetic or silica particles have been developed, in combination with instruments to facilitate the extraction procedure. The objective of the present study was to investigate the suitability of these automated methods for the isolation of Toxoplasma gondii DNA from amniotic fluid (AF). Therefore, three automated procedures were compared to two commercialized manual extraction methods. The MagNA Pure Compact (Roche), BioRobot EZ1 (Qiagen), and easyMAG (bioMérieux) automated procedures were compared to two manual DNA extraction kits, the QIAamp DNA minikit (Qiagen) and the High Pure PCR template preparation kit (Roche). Evaluation was carried out with two specific Toxoplasma PCRs (targeting the 529-bp repeat element), inhibitor search PCRs, and human beta-globin PCRs. The samples each consisted of 4 ml of AF with or without a calibrated Toxoplasma gondii RH strain suspension (0, 1, 2.5, 5, and 25 tachyzoites/ml). All PCR assays were laboratory-developed real-time PCR assays, using either TaqMan or fluorescent resonance energy transfer probes. A total of 1,178 PCRs were performed, including 978 Toxoplasma PCRs. The automated and manual methods were similar in sensitivity for DNA extraction from T. gondii at the highest concentration (25 Toxoplasma gondii cells/ml). However, our results showed that the DNA extraction procedures led to variable efficacy in isolating low concentrations of tachyzoites in AF samples (<5 Toxoplasma gondii cells/ml), a difference that might have repercussions since low parasite concentrations in AF exist and can lead to congenital toxoplasmosis.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19846633-10449471, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19846633-10675747, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19846633-11165598, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19846633-11241531, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19846633-12055840, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19846633-12177058, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19846633-12409363, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19846633-12729464, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19846633-12904352, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19846633-14532233, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19846633-15071031, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19846633-15297517, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19846633-15511271, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19846633-15583339, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19846633-15614694, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19846633-16102739, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19846633-16145151, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19846633-16860303, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19846633-16891478, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19846633-1691208, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19846633-17359328, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19846633-17942177, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19846633-17965106, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19846633-18199787, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19846633-18400914, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19846633-18463206, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19846633-8349765
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Dec
pubmed:issn
1098-660X
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Electronic
pubmed:volume
47
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
3881-6
pubmed:dateRevised
2010-9-28
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2009
pubmed:articleTitle
Multicenter comparative evaluation of five commercial methods for toxoplasma DNA extraction from amniotic fluid.
pubmed:affiliation
Hôpital Cochin AP-HP, Université Paris Descartes, Parasitology-Mycology Laboratory, Paris, France.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Multicenter Study