Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/19411763
Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
5
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
2009-5-4
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
In the two years that I have been Editor in Chief of the JCI, the editors and I have sent approximately 2,500 papers for external review. The referee reports that we've received have spanned the spectrum from incredibly insightful to completely unhelpful. Together with a longer piece immediately following this editorial, I would like to reflect on what I think makes a good review.
|
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
AIM
|
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:month |
May
|
| pubmed:issn |
1558-8238
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
| pubmed:volume |
119
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
1057
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2010-1-4
|
| pubmed:meshHeading | |
| pubmed:year |
2009
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
After further review.
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Editorial
|