Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3
pubmed:dateCreated
1991-10-17
pubmed:abstractText
We quantitatively compared the acoustic characteristics of passage of an endotracheal tube into the trachea with those of passage into the esophagus by analyzing the loudness and frequency (90% spectral edge frequency) of the sounds when auscultated at the suprasternal notch. We found that there was a significant difference (P less than 0.01) in maximum loudness between esophageal and tracheal intubations (0.15 +/- 0.05 and 0.25 +/- 0.06 V, respectively). However, there were no significant differences between the 90% spectral edge frequencies. We conclude that, without directly comparing the maximal acoustic amplitude of tracheal intubation with that of esophageal in each patient, one cannot distinguish between the two types of intubation by means of auscultation.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jul
pubmed:issn
0748-1977
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
7
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
232-6
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1991
pubmed:articleTitle
Auscultation cannot distinguish esophageal from tracheal passage of tube.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Anesthesiology, University of California, San Diego 92103.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study