Linked Life Data

1873610

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/1873610

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
5
pubmed:dateCreated
1991-9-26
pubmed:abstractText
The performances of hydrocolloid and alginate dressing materials have been compared in a study of 65 split skin graft donor areas. The donor areas were randomised between the two dressing materials. The rates of epithelialisation, the discomfort experienced by the patients and the convenience of the dressings in clinical use were compared. At the time of the first dressing change 87% of the donor areas dressed with the hydrocolloid and 86% of the donor areas dressed with the alginate were found to be more than 90% healed. The mean time from operation to the observation of complete healing was 10.0 days for the donor areas dressed with the hydrocolloid and 15.5 days for the donor areas dressed with the alginate: this difference was found to be statistically significant. The discomfort experienced by the two groups of patients was comparable. The rapid healing associated with the hydrocolloid dressing was thought to be of greatest benefit to inpatients; alginate dressings were thought to be more suitable for outpatients, as they proved to be simpler to use.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jul
pubmed:issn
0007-1226
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
44
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
333-7
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1991
pubmed:articleTitle
A comparative investigation of re-epithelialisation of split skin graft donor areas after application of hydrocolloid and alginate dressings.
pubmed:affiliation
Plastic Surgery and Burns Unit, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Randomized Controlled Trial