Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/18710018
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
8
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2008-8-19
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Gum elastic bougie (GEB) is one of the most useful devices for patients whose tracheas are difficult to intubate during anesthetic induction. But no previous study has evaluated the effects of the types of the tracheal tube. We hypothesized that wire-reinforced tracheal tubes were superior to standard tracheal tubes in the success rate of tracheal intubation when using GEB. We compared these two different types of tracheal tubes in using GEB.
|
pubmed:language |
jpn
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Aug
|
pubmed:issn |
0021-4892
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
57
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
1031-6
|
pubmed:meshHeading | |
pubmed:year |
2008
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
[Use of gum elastic bougie for tracheal intubation: comparison of different tracheal tubes].
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Anesthesiology, Chugoku Rosai General Hospital, Kure 737-0193.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
English Abstract,
Randomized Controlled Trial
|