Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/18077074
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
2
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2008-4-28
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Thanks to the earlier detection of breast cancer, the advent of neoadjuvant therapy and the development of more effective surgical procedures reducing treatment sequelae, conservative treatment has dramatically expanded over the past 15 years. Several factors have recognized negative aesthetic consequences for breast cancer patients: being overweight, having voluminous or on the contrary, very small breasts, having a tumor located in the lower quadrant, having high breast-tumor: breast-volume ratio. Tissue injuries induced by radiotherapy and chemotherapy, such as shrinking, fibrosis or induration, maximize the deleterious impact of surgery. The results of conservative treatment also deteriorate with time: weight gain is common and may result in increased breast asymmetry. Patients undergoing conservative treatment may experience sequelae including various degrees of the following dimorphisms, all possibly responsible for minor or even major breast deformity: breast asymmetry, loss of the nipple/areola complex, scar shrinkage and skin impairment, irregular shape and position of the nipple and areola. Various sensory symptoms have also been reported following conservative treatment, with patients complaining of hypo- or dysesthesia or even suffering actual pain. Breast lymphedema is also a common incapacitating after-effect that is believed to be largely underdiagnosed in clinical practice. Finally, like mastectomy, conservative breast surgery may induce serious psychological distress in patients who suffer the loss of physical integrity, womanhood or sexual arousal. Clinicians must be aware of the radiological changes indicative of late cancer recurrence. There are four types of modifications as follows: increased breast density, architectural distortion at the surgical site and formation of scar, mammary fat necrosis, and occurrence of microcalcifications. The management of sequelae of conservative breast treatment must therefore involve a multidisciplinary approach; patients not only expect better cosmetic appearance, but also a focus on other treatment advances such as improvement of psychological and sensory outcome. The interpretation of radiological images is also an integral part of the management of these patients at significant risk of recurrence.
|
pubmed:language |
fre
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Apr
|
pubmed:issn |
1768-319X
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:volume |
53
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
135-52
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:18077074-Breast Diseases,
pubmed-meshheading:18077074-Breast Neoplasms,
pubmed-meshheading:18077074-Combined Modality Therapy,
pubmed-meshheading:18077074-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:18077074-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:18077074-Mastectomy,
pubmed-meshheading:18077074-Pain,
pubmed-meshheading:18077074-Postoperative Complications
|
pubmed:year |
2008
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
[Post-treatment sequelae after breast cancer conservative surgery].
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Unité de chirurgie plastique et reconstructrice, centre Léon-Bérard, 28, rue Laënnec, 69373 Lyon cedex 08, France. delay@lyon.fnclcc.fr
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
English Abstract
|