Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/18023491
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
3
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2007-12-10
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Positioning verification is usually performed with treatment beam (MV) portal images (PI) using an electronic portal imaging device (EPID). A new alternative is the use of a low energy photon source (kV) and an additional EPID mounted to the accelerator gantry. This system may be used for PI or--with rotating gantry--as cone-beam CT (CBCT). The dose delivered to the patient by different imaging processes was measured.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Dec
|
pubmed:issn |
0167-8140
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
85
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
418-23
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:18023491-Cone-Beam Computed Tomography,
pubmed-meshheading:18023491-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:18023491-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:18023491-Phantoms, Imaging,
pubmed-meshheading:18023491-Prostatic Neoplasms,
pubmed-meshheading:18023491-Radiotherapy Dosage,
pubmed-meshheading:18023491-Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted,
pubmed-meshheading:18023491-Relative Biological Effectiveness
|
pubmed:year |
2007
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Phantom and in-vivo measurements of dose exposure by image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT): MV portal images vs. kV portal images vs. cone-beam CT.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim Medical Center, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, Mannheim, Germany. co_walter@web.de
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|