Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/17952878
Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
2
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
2008-5-29
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
The topic of this paper was prompted by a study for which one of us was the statistician. It was submitted to Annals of Internal Medicine. The paper had positive reviewer comment; however, the statistical reviewer stated that for the analysis to be acceptable for publication, the missing data had to be accounted for in the analysis through the use of baseline in a last observation carried forward imputation. We discuss the issues associated with this form of imputation and recommend that it should not be undertaken as a primary analysis.
|
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:issn |
1539-1612
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:copyrightInfo |
Copyright 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
|
| pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
| pubmed:volume |
7
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
142-6
|
| pubmed:meshHeading | |
| pubmed:articleTitle |
Issues with using baseline in last observation carried forward analysis.
|
| pubmed:affiliation |
Medical Statistics Group, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. S.A.Julious@Sheffield.ac.uk
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|