Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
11
pubmed:dateCreated
2007-11-6
pubmed:abstractText
Traditional culture of Leishmania spp. is labor intensive and has poor sensitivity. We evaluated a microculture method for the diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis in consecutive patients presenting to the Leishmaniasis Clinic at the Instituto de Medicina Tropical Alexander von Humboldt, Peru, for evaluation of skin lesions. Lesion aspirates were cultured in duplicate and parallel in traditional culture tubes containing modified Novy-MacNeal-Nicolle (NNN) medium or Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium 1640 with 10% fetal bovine serum (10% RPMI) and in 70-microl capillary tubes containing a mixture of lesion aspirate and 10% RPMI. For sensitivity analysis, the consensus standard was considered to be a positive result in any two of the following four tests: Giemsa-stained lesion smear, culture, kinetoplast DNA PCR, or leishmanin skin test. The outcome measures were sensitivity and time to culture positivity. Forty-five patients with 62 skin lesions were enrolled in the study, of which 53 lesions fulfilled the consensus criteria for a final diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Of these 53 lesions, 39 were culture positive: 38 in capillary tubes, 29 in traditional culture tubes with modified NNN medium, and 19 in traditional culture tubes with 10% RPMI medium. The sensitivity of microculture was 71.7%, versus 54.7% for traditional culture with NNN (P, 0.038) and 35.8% with 10% RPMI (P, <0.001). The mean times to culture positivity were 4.2 days by microculture, 5.2 days in NNN, and 6 days in 10% RPMI (P, 0.009). We have demonstrated that microculture is a more sensitive and time-efficient means of isolating Leishmania parasites from cutaneous lesions than traditional culture.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17881557-10219292, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17881557-10513726, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17881557-11015400, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17881557-11303265, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17881557-12734442, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17881557-12833011, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17881557-1311351, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17881557-14510185, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17881557-14614687, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17881557-14729756, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17881557-15031519, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17881557-15225981, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17881557-15578370, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17881557-15589796, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17881557-15777720, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17881557-16103589, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17881557-16156970, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17881557-16257344, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17881557-16417718, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17881557-16418526, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17881557-16597873, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17881557-16778313, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17881557-16930261, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17881557-1741010, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17881557-17492601, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17881557-1944414, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17881557-2108330, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17881557-2301704, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17881557-2301705, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17881557-3037735, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17881557-3598227, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17881557-6837840, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17881557-6859397, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17881557-7939061, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17881557-8396860, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17881557-8761571, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17881557-9715953
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Nov
pubmed:issn
0095-1137
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
45
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
3680-4
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-11-18
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2007
pubmed:articleTitle
Evaluation of a microculture method for isolation of Leishmania parasites from cutaneous lesions of patients in Peru.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. andrea.boggild@utoronto.ca
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't