Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
5
pubmed:dateCreated
2007-8-9
pubmed:abstractText
The aim of this study is to evaluate the predictive accuracy of different scoring systems on surgery for perforated peptic ulcer referred to an academic department of general surgery in a tertiary reference center.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Sep
pubmed:issn
1435-2451
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Electronic
pubmed:volume
392
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
581-5
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed-meshheading:17687581-APACHE, pubmed-meshheading:17687581-Adolescent, pubmed-meshheading:17687581-Adult, pubmed-meshheading:17687581-Aged, pubmed-meshheading:17687581-Aged, 80 and over, pubmed-meshheading:17687581-Cause of Death, pubmed-meshheading:17687581-Cohort Studies, pubmed-meshheading:17687581-Emergencies, pubmed-meshheading:17687581-Female, pubmed-meshheading:17687581-Health Status Indicators, pubmed-meshheading:17687581-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:17687581-Male, pubmed-meshheading:17687581-Middle Aged, pubmed-meshheading:17687581-Peptic Ulcer Perforation, pubmed-meshheading:17687581-Prognosis, pubmed-meshheading:17687581-Prospective Studies, pubmed-meshheading:17687581-ROC Curve, pubmed-meshheading:17687581-Reproducibility of Results, pubmed-meshheading:17687581-Survival Rate, pubmed-meshheading:17687581-Young Adult
pubmed:year
2007
pubmed:articleTitle
Comparison and validation of scoring systems in a cohort of patients treated for perforated peptic ulcer.
pubmed:affiliation
Fifth Department of Surgery, Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, 5. Cad 10/3, 06500, Ankara, Turkey.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Validation Studies