Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3
pubmed:dateCreated
1992-2-19
pubmed:abstractText
The study compares NORPLANT subdermal implants acceptors enrolled randomly for two different insertion procedures. One group (420 women) received the implants with the use of a scalpel according to the manufacturer's instructions. The other group (423 women) received the implant without an incision, directly through a sharpened trocar. The local signs and symptoms were observed at 7 and 30 days after insertion. Pain, tenderness, edema/swelling, ecchymosis and defective scar were considered. Complication rates were low and no significant differences were found between the two procedures. Based on the data of this study, we recommend inserting NORPLANT implants without the use of a scalpel.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Sep
pubmed:issn
0010-7824
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
44
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
217-21
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1991
pubmed:articleTitle
Comparison of local signs and symptoms after the insertion of Norplant implants with and without a scalpel.
pubmed:affiliation
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Brasil.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't